STUDIES OF PATIENTS WITH NON-PALPABLE BREAST LOCATIONS USING X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Jul 25, 2024
Keywords:
Mammography, X-ray, digital analysis, radiology, category, classification, calcification, tumor.

Main Article Content

Khakimov Galib Abdullaevich
Director, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Prof. Tashkent City Branch of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Oncology and Radiology of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Akhrarov Umida Sadritdinovna
Radiologist, Oncologist City Branch of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Oncology and Radiology of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

Abstract

Mammography is the only method for diagnosing mammary gland calcifications, which can be the primary and only sign of an incipient malignant process. Using digital X-ray mammography, patients were diagnosed with non-palpable breast cancer in which nodular formations were not detected during palpation. X-ray density of the mammary glands was assessed using the BI-RADS system (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. The results obtained confirm that digital X-ray mammography has made it possible to create on its basis two methods for studying the mammary glands, which are becoming widespread in the diagnosis of breast cancer patients with non-palpable breast formations.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khakimov Galib Abdullaevich, & Akhrarov Umida Sadritdinovna. (2024). STUDIES OF PATIENTS WITH NON-PALPABLE BREAST LOCATIONS USING X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 12(7), 113–119. Retrieved from https://giirj.com/index.php/giirj/article/view/7019
Issue
Vol. 12 No. 7 (2024): GIIRJ
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Fasching P. A. Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics / PA Fasching [et al] // Eur J Radiol . – 2006. - 60(3). P. 398-404.

Van Steen A. Short history of mammography: a Belgian perspective / A. Van Steen, R. Van Tiggelen // JBR–BTR. – 2007. – 90. - P. 151-153.

Leborgne R. The breast in roentgen diagnosis / Raule Leborgne . - Impressora Uruguay, Montevideo, 1953.

Tabár L. Beyond randomized controlled trials. Organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality / L. Tabar [et al] // Cancer. – 2001. – 91. – P. 1724–31.

Tabar L. All-cause mortality among breast cancer patients in a screening trial: Support for breast cancer mortality as an end point / L. Tabar , S. Duffy, MF Yen // J Med Screen. – 2002. – 9. – P. 159–162.

Pisano ED Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography in breast-cancer screening / ED Pisano [et al] // N Engl J Med. - 2005. - 17. - P. 1773–1783.

Freer PE Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer and implication for screening / PE Freer // Radiographic. – 2015. – 35. – P. 302-315.

Pinder SE Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): pathological features, differential diagnosis, prognostic factors and specimen evaluation / SE Pinder // Mod Pathol . – 2010. – 2. P. S8-13.

Weigel S. Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: Improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers / S. Weigel [et al] // Radiology. – 2010. - 255(3). - P. 738-45.

Ikeda DM the requisites: Breast imaging, third edition. / DM Ikeda, KK Miyake. – St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2017.

Dabbous FM Impact of a false-positive screening mammogram on subsequent screening behavior and stage at breast cancer diagnosis FM Dabbous [et al] // Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. – 2017 26(3):397403.