PROCEEDINGS ON CHALLENGING THE DECISION OF THE ARBITRATION COURT

Main Article Content

Кhakberdiev Abdumurad Abusaidovich

Abstract

In the conditions of modernization and reform of our country, the ongoing reforms in the law enforcement and judicial-legal spheres are aimed primarily at the comprehensive protection of human rights, freedoms and legitimate interests. Providing the State with the role of the main reformer, ensuring the rule of law, and conducting a strong social policy represent reforms that are being implemented gradually and gradually. At the same time, it should be noted that at present, in addition to competent courts, arbitration courts face various problems when considering a number of cases on civil and economic disputes. The article analyzes the proceedings in cases of challenging the decision of the arbitration court and develops appropriate proposals.

Article Details

How to Cite
Кhakberdiev Abdumurad Abusaidovich. (2023). PROCEEDINGS ON CHALLENGING THE DECISION OF THE ARBITRATION COURT. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 11(12), 307–314. Retrieved from https://giirj.com/index.php/giirj/article/view/6239
Section
Articles

References

Štefánik L., Khakberdiev A., Davronov D. CLASSIFICATION AND TYPES OF ARBITRATION COURTS // Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science. – 2022. – no. 79-2. - Рр. 19-25.

Муаллифлар жамоаси. Фуқаролик процессуал ҳуқуқи. Дарслик (Мамасиддиқов М. таҳрири остида). –2022. –Б.346. (The team of authors. Civil procedural law. Textbook (edited by M.Mamasiddikov). -2022. -Р.346.)

Яковлев В.Ф. Новое процессуальное законодательство о разрешении экономических споров // Хозяйство вправо. 2003. №2. -С.13-14. (3. Yakovlev V.F. New procedural legislation on the resolution of economic disputes // Economy to the right. 2003. No. 2. -pр.13-14.)

Решетникова И.В. Основные формы взаимодействия арбитражных и третейских судов // Третейский суд. 2004. №4(34). -С.104-105. (Reshetnikova I.V. The main forms of interaction between arbitration and arbitration courts // Arbitration Court. 2004. No. 4 (34). -рp.104-105.)

Фалькович М.С. Новое законодательство о третейских судах в России // Вестник ВАС РФ. 2003. №9. –С.76. (Falkovich M.S. New legislation on arbitration courts in Russia // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2003. No. 9. –p.76.)

Отахонов Ф.Х. Низоларни муқобил ҳал қилиш = Альтернативное разрешение споров [Матн] // Мақолалар тўплами. –Т.: 2022. –Б.40. (Otakhanov F.Kh. Alternative dispute resolution = Alternative dispute resolution [Text] // Collection of articles. -T.: 2022. -Р.40.).

Code of Civil Procedure. book 10 last amended by Article 1 of October 5, 2021 (federal law Gazette I, P. 4607) // gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/englisch_zpo.html. рр-178.

Brazil - LAW N0 9.307, 1996. // arbitrationlaw.com/sites/default/files/ free_pdfs/Brazil%20 Arbitration%20 Law. pdf. Рр. 49-51.

Ўзбекистон Республикасининг «Ҳакамлик судлари тўғрисида»ги Қонуни // lex.uz/дocs/1072079. (Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Arbitration Courts".)

Ўзбекистон Ҳакамлик судлари ассоциацияси Тошкент шаҳри филиали ҳузуридаги доимий фаолият кўрсатувчи Ҳакамлик судининг 2021 йилдаги 10/16-06-0024-сонли иши

. Б-46. (Case No. 10/16-06-0024 of 2021 of the Permanent Court of Arbitration under the Tashkent branch of the Association of Arbitration Courts of Uzbekistan. Р-46.)

Ўзбекистон халқаро арбитраж ва ҳакамлик судларини ривожлантириш жамоат Фонди ҳузуридаги Сирдарё вилояти ҳакамлик судининг 2021 йил 19 апрелдаги 02/21-02-0067, 2021 йил 8 сентябрдаги 02/21-02-117, 20021 йил 17 сентябрдаги 02/21-02-120-сонли иқтисодий ишлари. Б-35. (02/21-02-0067 of April 19, 2021, 02/21-02-117 of September 8, 2021, 02/21-02-120 of September 17, 2002 of the Arbitration Court of Sirdarya region under the Public Fund for the Development of International Arbitration and Arbitration Courts of Uzbekistan numerous economic affairs. Р-35.)

Отахонов Ф. Некоторые вопросы взаимодействия третейских судов с компетентными судами // Uzbek Journal of Legal Studies (UJOLS). Nagoya, Japan. 2018. -P.60. (Otakhonov F. Some issues of interaction between arbitration courts and competent courts// Uzbek Journal of Legal Studies (UJOLS). Nagoya, Japan. 2018. -P.60.)

Ўзбекистон Республикаси Бош прокуратурасининг 2022 йил 11 октябрдаги 13-4-440252/22-сон маълумотномаси. (Reference No. 13-4-440252/22 dated October 11, 2022 of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan.)

Гражданский процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации. 14.11.2002 N 138-ФЗ (ред. от 14.07.2022) // consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570. S-139. (Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. 11/14/2002 N 138-FZ (as amended on 07/14/2022) // consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570. Р-139.)

continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30420065.