ROLE OF EDUCATORS, CURRICULUM DESIGN, AND ASSESSMENT PRACTICES IN SHAPING COMMUNICATIVE LITERACY OUTCOMES
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article describes interplay between educators, curriculum design, and assessment practices in the context of shaping communicative literacy outcomes. The article deals with the communicative literacy, encompassing the ability to comprehend, produce, and critically engage with diverse forms of communication, that is crucial in preparing individuals for active participation in contemporary society. This paper reviews existing literature on the subject, examining the multifaceted contributions of educators, the impact of curriculum design, and the significance of assessment practices in fostering communicative literacy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
O'Malley, J. M., & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Addison-Wesley.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450-452.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Heinemann.
Wells, G. (2006). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academies Press.
ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages). (2012). World-Readiness Standards for Learning Languages.
Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language learning. University of Hawai'i Press.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education.
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for Culturally Responsive Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking: The Nature of Critical and Creative Thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(2), 2–9.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. ASCD.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. The Free Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Wiggins, G. (1989). Teaching to the (Authentic) Test. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41–47.
McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40–49.
Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment Literacy for Teachers: Faddish or Fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 4–11.
Sarsenbaeva Z. CROSS-CULTURAL INTERPRETATION OF SYMBOLS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LITERATURE //Евразийский журнал технологий и инноваций. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 10. – С. 146-149.
Sarsenbaeva Z. J. Pedagogical possibilities for improving linguocultural competence by means of studying proverbs //Colloquium-journal. – Голопристанський міськрайонний центр зайнятості= Голопристанский районный центр занятости, 2021. – №. 5-2. – С. 22-24.
Sarsenbaeva Z. COMPARING LINGUISTIC DEVICES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK NON-REALISTIC WORKS //Молодые ученые. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 15. – С. 32-34.