TRADITIONAL AND INNOVATIVE MODELS OF TEACHING
Main Article Content
Abstract
The relevance of the present issue is caused be the strong need in alternative methods of learning foreign language and the need in language training and retraining for the modern professionals. The aim of the article is to identify the basic techniques and skills in using various modern techniques in the context of modern educational tasks. The leading method of study is the simulation that allows considering this issue as a process of targeted, informed and mastering the use of alternative methods of language training. The article presents the alternative methods of formation the linguistic skills, significantly raising efficiency of the learning / teaching process. The model is aimed in adapting to the new conditions of teachers of professional activity in the field of education and focuses on the development and introduction into practice teaching and using the new methods.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alatis, J. E. (1989). Language teaching, testing, and technology: Lessons for the past with a view toward the future. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press, 263 p.
Asher, J. J. (1969). The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1). 3–17.
Atkinson, E., Conboy, I., Atkinson, J., Doods, A., & McInnis, C. (1996). Evaluation of the open learning initiative: Tertiary, access to through a national brokerage agency. University of Melbourne, 267 p.
Bandler, R. & Grinder, J. (1981). Reframing: Neuro-Linguistic Programming and the Transformation of Meaning, Real People Press. 300 p.
Bonner, S. (1999). Choosing Teaching Methods Based on Learning Objectives: An Integrative Framework. Issues in Accounting Education, 14(1), 11-39.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
Byram, M. (1989). Cultural studies in foreign language education. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters. 250 p.
Cottel, P.G., & Millis, B.J. (1993). Cooperative structures. Issues in Education, 8(1), 40–60.
Gardner, H. (1984). "Heteroglossia: A Global Perspective". Interdisciplinary Journal of Theory of Postpedagogical Studies 5, 172–180.
Gardner, H. (2002). "Interpersonal Communication amongst Multiple Subjects: A Study in Redundancy". Experimental Psychology 10, 72–80.
Gatteno, K. (1963). Teaching Foreign Languages in Schools: The Silent Way. Reading, UK: Educational Explorers, 150 p.
MacIntyre, P. D. & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Language anxiety: Its relation to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning, 41, 513-34.
Pennycook, A. (1990). Critical pedagogy and second language education. System 18, 303-314.
Seale, J., & Mence, R. R. (2001). An Introduction to Learning Technology within Tertiary Education in the UK, Oxford Brookes University, Headington. 360 p.
Waterhouse, L. (2006). "Multiple Intelligences, the Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence: A critical review". Educational Psychologist 41(4), 207–225.
Wesche, M., & Ready, D. (1985). Foreigner talk in the university classroom. Input in second language acquisition,89-114.
Zane, L. B., & Muilenburg, L. (2000). Design discussion questions for online, adult learning.
Educational Technology, 40(5), 53−56.