COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHORT VOWELS OF NOUNS’ IN CLASSICAL AND MODERN PERSIAN

Main Article Content

Hamitov Dilovar Lutfullozoda

Abstract

In the article, the short vowels in classical Persian are compared with the vowels in modern Persian. The reason is that classical Persian was divided into three independent languages in the XIX-XX centuries: modern Persian - in Iran, Tajik - in Tajikistan and Dari - in Afghanistan.Each of these languages has its own characteristics. It also has places that are different from classical Persian.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamitov Dilovar Lutfullozoda. (2021). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHORT VOWELS OF NOUNS’ IN CLASSICAL AND MODERN PERSIAN. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9(9), 28–32. Retrieved from https://giirj.com/index.php/giirj/article/view/237
Section
Articles

References

Alimova X. Z. Fors, dariy va tojik tillarining shakllanish bosqichlari: umumiylik va farqlar (fonetik tahlil) //Sharqshunoslik. – T.: ToshDSHI, 2008. – № 1-2, –B. 28-34

Burhon.M. Burhoni qote’.5 ҷ –D., 2014. 805 s.

Gʻiyosuddin M. Gʻiyos-ul-lug‘ot. 2 ҷ– Dushanbe: Adib.1987.882s .

Quronbekov A, A. Vohidov, T. Ziyayeva. Fors tili. Musiqa, Toshkent. 2006. 565 b.Abdusamadov M. Fors tili. Sharq. 2007. 568 b.

Quronbekov A, A. Vohidov, T. Ziyayeva. Fors tili. Musiqa, Toshkent. 2006. 565 b .

Quronbekov A. Klassik fors tili hamda hozirgi davr fors, dariy va tojik tillari fonemalar tizimining qiyosiy tahlili//Sharq klassik filologiyasi. – Toshkent: ToshDSHI, 2009. – B. 146.

Quronbekov A. Fors tilidagi fonetik o‘zgarishlar sababi//Sharqshunoslik. – Toshkent:ToshDSHI, 2011.– № 1. – B. 154.

Rastorguyeva V.S. Osnovы iranskogo yazыkoznaniya:novoiranskiye yazыki. 3ch, Nauka-Moskva: 1982. 572 s.

Rubinchik Yu.A. Grammatika sovremennogo persidskogo literaturnogo yazыka.-M: 2001.600 s